SHARE

Share |

Thursday, September 27, 2012

From the Delaware Riverkeeper

Philadelphia Calls for Overturning Act 13, Upholds Court Decision Calling Act 13 Pre-emption Clause Unconstitutional
Activists, Health Advocates Praise City Council Resolution
Passed Unanimously Today
Philadelphia, PA – Activists and community leaders from across the Philadelphia area praised the Philadelphia City Council’s resolution today opposing Pennsylvania Act 13.  The resolution opposes Act 13 and affirms the Commonwealth Court’s decision to strike down a portion of that law that attempted to strip all state municipalities of their ability to protect the health and safety of their residents by passing bans, moratoria, or even the most moderate zoning restrictions on any aspect of heavy industrial shale gas drilling.
The resolution approved by City Council today supports the Commonwealth Court decision which found Act 13 unconstitutional because it removes the ability of local governments to legislate to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its residents regarding gas and oil operations.  The legal challenge to the law was brought by seven municipalities, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, and Dr. Mehernosh Khan in March of this year.
In July, the Commonwealth Court declared the municipal pre-emption provisions of Act 13 null, void, and unenforceable, and allowed an injunction on its implementation to remain in place while the case proceeds to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.  Philadelphia City Council joins over 70 local government units supporting the overturning of the law and several “Friends of the Court” who have filed amicus briefs in defense of the Commonwealth Court ruling.
“Philadelphia City Council has taken decisive action today to protect the drinking water for its residents and the region by casting a vote against Act 13, the law that pushes gas and oil operations into every corner of every municipality in the state.  The City is throwing its support behind the communities of Pennsylvania instead of drilling and fracking special interests.  This critical support is much appreciated as we go to the Supreme Court to defend the overturning of Act 13,” said Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, an original plaintiff in the lawsuit.
“With today’s resolution, the Philadelphia City Council has asserted what should have been obvious to Governor Corbett and the state legislature: municipalities have a constitutional right to regulate activities within their bounds, especially when it comes to inherently dangerous practices such as hydraulic fracturing,” said Sam Bernhardt, an organizer with Food & Water Watch, a consumer rights group. “It should also be obvious to the governor that the people of Pennsylvania have a right to clean air and clean water, rights that fracking doesn’t allow for.”
“Act 13’s attack on democratic rights, heath and safety managed to outrage a broad spectrum of the population from firefighters to farmers, including the great city of Philadelphia, which happens to be full of people who drink water, breathe air and recognize a terrible law when they see one.  The Philadelphia City Council has done a great job of standing with residents and environmental advocates across the state in opposing this unjust law,” said Iris Marie Bloom, executive director of Protecting Our Waters.  “We’re delighted to see the council once again show positive leadership and resist fracking.”
“City Council’s vote to oppose Act 13 sends a clear message that Philadelphia defends a Pennsylvania municipality’s right to make decisions that protect residents’ public health and quality of life.  City Council recognizes how imperative it is for local governments to have the power to decide where, or even if, the shale gas industry can operate equipment that emits air pollution in people’s backyards and that accelerates climate change,” said Matt Walker, community outreach coordinator with Clean Air Council.

No comments:

Post a Comment